Cross-Border Wealth Management and Global Asset Allocation Strategies

For high-net-worth individuals (HNWIs) with investment experience, cross-border wealth management and global asset allocation have become central themes of modern wealth planning. In an era of deeply interconnected financial markets, HNW investors are looking to diversify across multiple jurisdictions – including Singapore, Mainland China, Hong Kong, the US, and the UK to balance risks and capture opportunities. This bilingual article uses funds, ETFs, crypto assets, digital banking, and USD liquidity management as focal points to examine how various assets differ in cross-border accessibility and liquidity across regions. It also compares regulatory and tax environments in key markets, analyzes global allocation strategies using ETFs versus active funds, discusses the use of digital banks and cash management tools, and considers the role of crypto assets within compliance. Finally, we outline how these instruments can be employed in scenarios such as global tax planning, health insurance coverage, and trust-based legacy planning for wealthy individuals.

Cross-Border Asset Availability and Liquidity

When allocating assets globally, HNW investors must understand how asset availability and liquidity vary across markets. Cross-border capital flows remain tightly managed in Mainland China – strong capital controls mean that only a few schemes (such as Stock Connect, Bond Connect, and the Wealth Management Connect) permit limited two-way investment flows. For example, since the launch of the Greater Bay Area Wealth Management Connect in 2021, the number of Mainland investor accounts under the scheme jumped from 25,000 to 95,000 in a year after rules were relaxed, underscoring the demand for southbound investment into Hong Kong. In contrast, Hong Kong and Singapore maintain open capital accounts, enabling HNW clients to invest in global markets relatively freely through local institutions. Hong Kong, in particular, leverages its unique gateway role to link Mainland China with international markets. Schemes like the Mutual Recognition of Funds (MRF) allow Mainland investors to purchase Hong Kong-domiciled funds, with cumulative northbound sales reaching around US$2.95 billion by early 2024, reflecting how connectivity initiatives have improved cross-border asset access.

Another aspect of cross-border liquidity is the depth and ease of trading in each market. For instance, the US and UK markets are highly liquid with large trading volumes and tight bid-ask spreads for stocks and ETFs, offering very high liquidity. Markets like Singapore and Hong Kong are relatively smaller but still feature sufficient volume and market depth to meet HNW investment needs. Hong Kong has also enhanced global connectivity by linking with other regions in 2024, Hong Kong saw cross-listings of ETFs in Saudi Arabia, and two such ETFs became the largest in the Saudi market with a combined market cap of US$1.6 billion. This indicates that Hong Kong assets are gaining broader liquidity support globally through cross-listings and partnerships. Overall, financial hubs like Singapore and Hong Kong boast robust infrastructure and deep enough market liquidity, making them key platforms for HNW individuals to execute global asset allocations.

Regulatory and Tax Environment Across Markets

Regulatory frameworks and tax regimes in each jurisdiction greatly affect cross-border investments. On the regulatory side, Mainland China imposes significant restrictions on the distribution of wealth management products and cross-border investments. Domestic investors are largely limited to outbound channels like Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) quotas to invest overseas, and foreign financial institutions face barriers to operating onshore. Recently, China has tightened controls on data and capital outflows to safeguard financial stability. In contrast, Hong Kong and Singapore have regulatory systems aligned with international standards, robust investor protection, and proactive policies to attract global wealthy clients (such as family office incentives).

Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), for example, has introduced profit tax concessions for family-owned investment holding vehicles and relaunched the Capital Investment Entrant Scheme to entice affluent individuals. By early 2025, the SFC had also granted licenses to 10 virtual asset trading platforms to cement Hong Kong’s status as a financial hub for even digital assets. Singapore’s Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) similarly embraces innovation by issuing digital banking licenses and fostering fintech development, while simultaneously enforcing rigorous anti-money laundering (AML) and compliance standards to uphold market integrity.

On the tax front, jurisdictions vary widely in their appeal to HNWIs. Hong Kong and Singapore use territorial tax systems wherein most offshore income is tax-exempt and domestic tax rates are relatively low. Crucially, neither jurisdiction imposes capital gains tax, nor do they levy estate or inheritance taxes, making them extremely friendly for cross-border asset holding.

In Hong Kong, for example, dividends and capital gains from stocks and funds are not taxed at all for individuals, and funds remitted into Hong Kong face no additional taxation – a benefit comparable in effect to the UK’s erstwhile non-domiciled (“non-dom”) tax regime. It is worth noting, however, that the UK in 2024 announced the abolition of its centuries-old non-dom scheme from April 2025. Under the new rules, wealthy residents who have lived in the UK for over 4 years will no longer be exempt on worldwide income (even if not remitted), and those after 10 years of residency will become liable for UK inheritance tax on global assets.

Meanwhile, the United States practices citizenship-based taxation – all US citizens and permanent residents must report and potentially pay tax on worldwide income regardless of residence.

This complex and far-reaching tax obligation has prompted some HNW Americans to renounce their citizenship to simplify tax affairs. In summary, Singapore and Hong Kong attract international capital with low-tax regimes and clear rules, whereas Western markets like the US and UK impose higher tax burdens but offer mature legal systems. Thus, HNWIs must carefully consider their residency status, relevant tax treaties, and the differing tax regimes when allocating assets globally to achieve optimal tax efficiency.

ETFs vs. Active Funds – Global Strategy Perspective

In global portfolios, passive index-tracking funds (ETFs) and actively managed mutual funds each offer distinct advantages, and HNW investors often blend both to optimize performance. Over the past decade, passive investing has swept the markets worldwide.

In equities, low-cost and transparent index funds have attracted massive inflows, culminating in a historic crossover by end-2023: global passive equity funds’ assets reached $15.1 trillion, surpassing the $14.3 trillion held by active equity funds for the first time.

Fund flow patterns underscore this shift in 2023 alone, active equity funds saw net outflows of $576 billion while passive funds enjoyed $466 billion of net inflows.

The strong performance of major indices, particularly driven by leading U.S. mega-cap stocks, has meant cap-weighted index ETFs have outperformed the majority of active funds in recent years.

That said, active management still has a role to play in certain markets and asset classes where skilled managers can add value. A common misconception is that active funds underperform in all cases. In reality, there are areas like bonds and real estate where active management often shows an edge.

Morningstar data indicate that in 2024 only 42% of U.S. active funds beat their passive peers (and less than one-quarter did so over the past decade), with particularly few long-term winners in large-cap equity categories.

However, active strategies shone in fixed income and niche categories – 63% of active bond funds outperformed their passive counterparts in 2024. Active bond managers took on additional credit risk and benefited from narrowing spreads, giving them an advantage in that environment.

Similarly, active managers saw improved success rates in small-cap equities and global real estate funds in the short term. These findings suggest that in highly efficient markets like large-cap stocks, passive investing tends to win, whereas in areas with greater inefficiencies or specialized knowledge (such as certain emerging markets, small caps, or alternative strategies), active management can still prove its worth. Therefore, HNW investors should play to each approach’s strengths: use low-cost global index ETFs for broad core diversification, while deploying select high-quality active funds in segments like emerging markets, smaller companies, or alternative strategies to capture alpha opportunities.

Moreover, ETFs themselves have evolved into various strategies, including smart beta and actively managed ETFs, which essentially package active strategies into index-like vehicles. Investors should be aware that an ETF’s liquidity is not solely reflected by its trading volume a common misconception is to equate an ETF’s average daily volume with its total.

In reality, large ETFs utilize a creation/redemption mechanism whereby institutional players can transact directly with the issuer to create or redeem shares, tapping into the liquidity of the underlying assets. This means even if secondary market trading appears thin, significant orders can still be executed efficiently via the primary market, providing an extra layer of liquidity. Therefore, when using ETFs for global allocation, HNW investors should consider not only expense ratios and tracking error but also the depth of liquidity in the ETF’s underlying market and the impact of different market trading hours on accessibility.

Digital Banks, Money Market Funds, and Cash Management

Effective management of cash and liquid assets is also crucial in global allocation. In recent years, the rise of digital banks has given HNW individuals convenient platforms for multi-currency cash management.

In hubs like Singapore and Hong Kong, licensed digital banks (and fintech platforms) allow clients to hold multiple currencies in one place and transfer or exchange funds across markets in real-time.

This capability enables agile deployment of liquidity globally and helps investors capture opportunities by moving money quickly. Digital banks often offer competitive deposit rates and low-cost cross-border transfers, making them a valuable complement to traditional banks for those managing liquidity in USD, EUR, HKD, SGD, etc. However, it is important to choose regulated digital banks with strong risk controls, as regulators worldwide are increasingly stringent about compliance in cross-border digital financial services.

At the same time, money market funds (MMFs) and similar cash management tools have come back into favor. With global interest rates rising since 2022, MMF yields have increased substantially, drawing a flood of idle cash into these low-risk vehicles. In 2023–2024, U.S. money market funds reached record sizes: by March 2025, total MMF assets hit a historic $7.03 trillion.

MMFs invest in short-term instruments like Treasury bills and bank paper, providing near-market interest returns while offering daily liquidity. HNW investors can use money funds or ultra-short Treasury ETFs to manage USD liquidity and park cash across time zones. For example, one can park a portion of USD cash in U.S.-based MMFs to earn yield, while keeping some cash in Asian markets via digital banks for immediate needs. It’s worth noting that MMFs can face liquidity stress in extreme conditions; regulators in various jurisdictions (e.g. the U.S. SEC and Europe’s ESMA) have tightened oversight of money funds to ensure they can handle heavy redemptions and maintain financial stability.

Beyond MMFs, HNW clients often utilize short-term US Treasuries and structured bank deposits to manage cash positions. For instance, by buying 3–6 month U.S. Treasury bills, investors can earn a secure interest return and have the flexibility to roll over or reallocate upon maturity. Many private banks also offer USD structured deposit products that allow clients to earn slightly above market interest over a fixed term, sometimes embedding currency or rate options to boost returns.

Such instruments are popular in Singapore and Hong Kong, providing enhanced yield options for cash holdings. Investors should be mindful of any liquidity lock-up periods and associated risks when using these yield-enhancing tools. In summary, with multi-currency digital bank accounts for convenience and MMFs or short-duration debt for solid returns, HNW individuals can combine these cash management tools to maximize yield on cash while preserving liquidity.

Crypto Assets and Web3 Products Within Compliance

Crypto assets have in recent years become an unavoidable topic in global portfolios, and interest among HNW circles is rising. Given their high volatility and regulatory uncertainty, it is crucial to engage only in a compliant and cautious manner. Major markets differ significantly in their regulatory stance on crypto assets.

Mainland China has essentially banned cryptocurrency trading and mining, focusing instead on the officially sanctioned digital yuan (CBDC) and certain blockchain applications. Hong Kong, by contrast, has adopted an open-but-regulated approach: since 2023 it has implemented a licensing regime for virtual asset trading platforms, aiming to become a regulated hub for digital assets.

Singapore likewise welcomes digital asset innovation but emphasizes a “yes to innovation, no to speculation” ethos – the MAS only grants Digital Payment Token licenses to firms meeting stringent prudential standards (especially AML controls), with only 14 companies licensed as of late 2023.

In the United States, lacking comprehensive new legislation thus far, regulators have relied on enforcing existing securities laws on the crypto industry, and large institutions are awaiting SEC approval for products like Bitcoin ETFs to gain clearer access to this asset class.

Within a compliant framework, HNW individuals can treat crypto assets as a high-risk, high-upside alternative allocation a small proportion to diversify the portfolio. When investing in major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin or Ethereum, doing so via licensed custodians, regulated exchanges, or exchange-traded products (such as the Bitcoin ETFs already launched in Canada and parts of Europe) is the proper route to ensure compliance.

Global asset management giants are softening their stance as well. For example, BlackRock’s model portfolio team stated in 2025 that they believe Bitcoin has long-term investment merit for certain investors and can provide unique diversification benefits to portfolios.

They noted that amid geopolitical instability and ballooning sovereign debt, the “store of value” narrative for Bitcoin may continue to resonate with more investors.

Such involvement by mainstream institutions indicates that crypto assets are gradually being integrated into the regulated financial system. Indeed, the launch of spot Bitcoin exchange-traded products (ETPs) in some markets in 2024 was met with dramatic inflows, suggesting a new wave of interest has begun.

That said, the crypto/Web3 space still entails many risks and unknowns, and HNW investors should remain cautious. Global bodies like the IMF and Financial Stability Board have called for applying the principle of “same activity, same risk, same regulation” to the crypto industry to prevent regulatory arbitrage.

When dabbling in Web3 products (such as decentralized finance or tokenized assets), investors must ensure that the platforms and products are subject to oversight in their jurisdiction. For example, some regulated security token offerings or “controlled DeFi” products launched by exchanges can provide a balance between Web3 innovation and compliance. In Hong Kong, HNW clients may invest in regulated digital asset funds or security token issuances via licensed intermediaries; in Singapore, family offices can explore blockchain applications within MAS’s regulatory sandbox framework. In any case, the allocation to crypto assets in a wealth portfolio should be strictly proportional to the investor’s risk tolerance, with ample safeguards in place to withstand high market volatility and potential regulatory changes.

Applying These Tools in Global Tax, Insurance, and Legacy Planning

In managing a globally diversified portfolio, HNW individuals must integrate the above investment tools with broader wealth planning objectives such as tax optimization, medical coverage, and intergenerational wealth transfer.

Starting with tax planning, different investment products can help balance tax burdens across jurisdictions. For example, an investor who is resident in a high-tax country might invest in ETFs and funds through offshore accounts or entities, thus rolling up capital gains in a low-tax jurisdiction and deferring tax liabilities.

Additionally, taking advantage of tax treaties can avoid double taxation – for instance, a U.S. investor buying European stocks via Ireland-domiciled ETFs can benefit from U.S.-Ireland tax agreements to reduce withholding taxes on dividends. Strategic asset location (deciding which assets to hold in which jurisdiction) is key to legally minimizing taxes in a global portfolio.

Secondly, for global health insurance and risk management, HNW individuals often use specific insurance and trust structures to provide protection. For example, to cover cross-border medical expenses, one can purchase international health insurance plans that will pay out whether the client is treated in Singapore, Hong Kong, the UK, or elsewhere. Similarly, insurance-based wealth planning vehicles like Private Placement Life Insurance (PPLI) which combine an investment account with an insurance policy – are recognized across multiple jurisdictions.

According to reinsurer RGA, PPLI is “particularly suitable for HNW individuals” as it combines tax efficiency, asset protection, and estate planning in a compliant way to manage assets across jurisdictions. By placing a portion of investment assets under an insurance policy, returns can accrue tax-deferred within the policy, and upon the insured’s passing, the assets are paid out as death benefits to beneficiaries, often avoiding estate or inheritance taxes in a lawful manner.

In wealth hubs like Hong Kong and Singapore, such policy arrangements are popular among affluent families and are commonly used for cross-border legacy planning.

Finally, trusts and legacy planning play a pivotal role in global wealth management. For ultra-high-net-worth families with properties, businesses, and investments across multiple countries, establishing an international trust or family foundation can help ensure assets pass smoothly to the next generation while avoiding onerous probate processes and hefty estate taxes in each locale.

A key challenge in cross-border wealth transfer is reconciling different legal systems: common law vs. civil law jurisdictions have very different rules on inheritance and forced heirship. For example, consider an Asian UHNW family with assets in Mainland China, Hong Kong, and the UK without a unified plan, their estate could be subject to Chinese forced succession rules, Hong Kong probate, and the UK’s 40% inheritance tax all at once.

By setting up a family trust in a jurisdiction with stable legal environment and favorable tax treatment, and settling global assets into the trust, the family can have a trustee distribute assets according to their wishes across borders. This can effectively mitigate legal conflicts and reduce tax burdens associated with multi-jurisdiction estates. Of course, trust structures must be tailored to the settlor’s nationality and the asset locations, and ensure compliance with laws in all relevant jurisdictions.

Many private banks and law firms in Singapore and Hong Kong offer cross-border trust services, helping families create a “family charter” and governance mechanisms to preserve harmony as wealth is transmitted across geography and generations.

In today’s complex and changing environment, wealthy investors are shifting from a single-market view of wealth management to a truly global strategy. Instruments like funds and ETFs provide the building blocks for global diversification, while crypto assets and Web3 represent emerging opportunities – all to be employed within a compliant and prudent framework.

By leveraging digital banks and money market funds for liquidity, capitalizing on tax advantages across jurisdictions, and utilizing insurance and trust structures, HNW individuals can construct a global, all-weather portfolio.

In practice, one should continuously refer to the latest research and guidance from authorities and professional advisors in each market, keeping strategies up-to-date. In an era where the global economy presents both challenges and opportunities, a well-crafted, professional, and clear cross-border wealth management and asset allocation strategy will empower investors to achieve better preservation and growth of wealth and ensure a lasting legacy for future generations.

References

• BCG, Global Wealth Report 2024: The GenAI Era Unfolds – Press Release, July 2024 (Boston Consulting Group)bcg.combcg.com.

• Reuters, Chinese capital outflows to boost Hong Kong markets, central bank chief says, Mar 26, 2025reuters.comreuters.com.

• Hong Kong SFC – via Hong Kong Business, Asset growth, connectivity drive HK’s capital markets in 2024, Jan 2025hongkongbusiness.hkhongkongbusiness.hk.

• Withers Worldwide, A review of the tax regimes in Singapore and Hong Kong, Nov 13, 2024withersworldwide.comwithersworldwide.com.

• Outbound Investment, UK Abolishes Non-Dom Tax Regime from 2025, Apr 17, 2025outboundinvestment.comoutboundinvestment.com.

• Reuters, Global passive equity funds' assets eclipsed active in 2023 for first time, Feb 1, 2024reuters.comreuters.com.

• InvestmentNews, Active funds still struggling against passive peers, Morningstar says, Mar 12, 2025investmentnews.cominvestmentnews.com.

• ICI – Investment Company Institute, Money Market Fund Assets Hit Record $7 Trillion, Mar 6, 2025ici.org.

• Reuters, Crypto exchange Coinbase secures Singapore payments licence, Oct 2, 2023reuters.comreuters.com.

• BlackRock, Why Bitcoin? A perspective from model portfolio builders, Feb 26, 2025blackrock.comblackrock.com.

• IMF Blog (Adrian et al.), Crypto Needs Comprehensive Policies to Protect Economies and Investors, Jul 18, 2023imf.org.

• RGA – Reinsurance Group of America, Innovations in High Net Worth Insurance, 2023rgare.com.

• Private Banker International, Cross-border wealth: EFG International rewrites playbook for wealth transfer, Apr 29, 2025privatebankerinternational.comprivatebankerinternational.com.